The tragic stories of farmers committing suicide have come
back to haunt the people of Telangana. When they struggled to win statehood
they knew that along with freedom from the control of former oppressive rulers
would come many difficulties. The new state is critically short of water and
power. The state’s fledgling budget takes note of the crisis looming over its poor
small and marginal farmers, who are mostly SC and ST and form over half of the
farming population. For the first time, the government recognises the
importance of local irrigation tanks, and paying tribute to the genius of the
ancient Kakatiyas, it plans to revive 45,000 of these small structures over the
next five years. Around Rs 2000 crores has been allotted in the budget to
improve 9000 of them within one year and increase the land under irrigation in
the ayacut regions. It will be of great assistance to small farmers, many of
whom have suffered grievous losses by digging deep bore wells without finding
water. These long neglected measures by former governments will permit
ground-water tables to rejuvenate, and also relieve pressure on the power
situation to some degree.
However, while this much-needed measure is welcome, the
small irrigation potential which will be created will not help most of the
small farmers, or the labour dependant on them. Lift irrigation schemes under
Telangana conditions, or technologies such as drip irrigation, can also only be
of marginal benefit to the poor. Sensing the desperate struggle for survival
waged by India’s small dryland farmers, who are the great majority of cultivators,
Dr MS Swaminathan, the father of the Green Revolution, called for an equally
important ‘brown revolution.’
During the 1960s, India went through a period of grave food
shortage and up to 10 million tonnes of grain were imported every year from
America under their PL480 programme, which permitted rupee payment for the
grain. American politicians openly talked about using food-grain export as a
political lever against India. The Green Revolution pioneered by Drs Norman
Borlaug and Swaminathan enabled India to free itself from impending famine, and
regain a measure of policy independence. However while wheat production
increased dramatically in the water-rich areas of Punjab, and rice to a lesser
extent in the Godavari and Cauvery basins, the new hybrid varieties brought
several problems with them. Farmers took to mono-crop cultivation since the
government offered minimum support prices for grain. Most of the local more nutritive
varieties ceased to be grown, because farmers could get marginally higher
yields with hybrids. The heavy usage of chemicals resulted in loss of natural
carbon content in the soils, and pest attacks increased since ecological
balances were disturbed. Over time wastage of surface irrigation water resulted
in salination and loss of cultivable land. Large farmers became very rich and
politically powerful, and few politicians worried about the new crisis
developing in agriculture. Even economists became bemused by the growing trend
in cereal production, and neglected the vital nutritional necessity of
providing protein-bearing pulses, oilseeds, fruits, vegetables, and spices for
a growing population. No party cared about the fate of poor, small farmers eking
out a living by dryland cultivation of these essential crops.
After the bifurcation of the erstwhile AP state, Telangana has
the most extensive drylands of any state in India. If a new national battle is
to be launched to enable dryland farmers to create sustainable livelihoods, it
should be in Telangana, and it is here that victory must be won over uncertain
monsoons, eroding soils, and past governmental neglect.
Telangana has been formed in the nick of time to avail
itself of the unique expertise of two stalwarts who can help our SC and BC
small farmers attain sustainable livelihoods and bring rural prosperity to the
State. Dr T. Hanumantha Rao, former engineer-in-chief, minor irrigation,
has designed his ‘four waters’ model for drylands by integrating engineering
with agro-forestry for drylands. In such terrain around two-thirds of the water
available is held in the plant-root system, and eventually lost through
evopo-transpiration, unless the surface area is cooled by a green cover, and
the soil enabled to hold water through properly designed underground
percolation tanks. With such specially designed systems, he has helped, as a UN
consultant, over 15 water-starved countries become water sufficient and improve
agricultural production. Dr. R. Dwarakinath, former vice-chancellor, Karnataka
agricultural university, has headed AME India Foundation, another unique group
of committed scientists, for 30 years. AME in tandem with FAO developed
collaborative farmer field schools in India – recognised as a vital necessity
by Mr K. Chandrasekhar Rao, chief minister – and by using ecological ‘least
external input’ methods, which husband soils and water, have demonstrated that
poor dryland farmers can quickly increase production and incomes even under
variable monsoon conditions.
Such new scientific
technology, which is actually a development of tried and true indigenous
methods, brings to mind the authoritative examination of Indian agricultural
practices by a team of British scientists under Dr. John Augustus Voelcker, in
the late 19th century. His report to the British government
emphasized, as Dr. Dwarakinath does, the excellence of traditional farming
systems under which a multiplicity of crops are grown by the small farmer,
along with the maintenance of farm animals, for providing local nutritional
security.
The 19th century experience of Europe and America
has shown that catalyzing local producer associations of farmers is of great
benefit for agricultural growth since most individual farmers are too poor to
lift themselves out of poverty. Hopefully, the new pro-people Telangana
government will quickly encourage such associations to emerge and link them
securely with banks to finance growth. Local PRI governmental bodies should
also be empowered to take decisions in the local interest, and these could
monitor and support farmer associations.
There has been much speculation among top economist circles
about inviting FDI participation in rural areas for growth. This is quite
unlikely to happen with the level of rural poverty at present, except in
pro-corporate thrust areas for using chemicals or GM crops, which can only have
a negative impact on dryland agriculture. It would be best in the interests of
Telangana’s poor SC and BC dryland farmers that an initial slow growth policy
is followed which depends on local consolidation as producer associations,
local knowledge, and optimal use of resources such as water and soils. Very
soon, the growth curve could curve upwards exponentially as income generated in
small hands is compounded for greater production.
The recent budget declared that the services sector accounted
for 52% of the GDSP of Telangana, with manufacturing a poor second, while
agriculture contributed only 12%.
This situation is unstable and self-limiting. Even well
known economists like Dr. Manmohan Singh and Dr Montek Ahluwalia continued to
bask in the growth of the national services sector during the IT boom period.
While this may be laudable for mature economies, like that of America, Germany,
or Japan, where manufacturing and trade meet the need for goods of a large
middle-class population, it is nothing short of disastrous for a poor country,
which must manufacture goods for its people. The manufacturing sector can only
grow with increasing local demand – and not merely by export promotion. If the
majority of its population is rural and poor, their very poverty stultifies
further economic growth. Hence a timely attention to the fate of small dryland
farmers will have a salutary knock-on effect on the larger national economy.
Telangana can create an exemplary example for the Union government to follow.
Let us hope that Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao’s ‘Grow It Telangana’ will lead the
way, and help Mr. Modi’s ‘Make It India’ campaign to become a reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment